Friday, March 06, 2026

What should I eat first thing in the day to clear my stomach and detox my body?

 · 
Follow

The amount of misinformation in some of the answers to this question is simply stunning.

First of all: the whole idea of “detoxing” — be it through detoxification products / diets / supplements, or drinking warm water for that matter — is absolute nonsense. The first category represents a way to flush your money (instead of toxins); the second category is a persistent pseudo-scientific fantasy — drinking water is good and healthy, but your body doesn’t care at all if the water is 15°C or 35°C.

Other “detox methods” such as complete fasting, water or juice-only fasting, only-fruit or only-vegetable diets, supplements or enemas can even be (very) dangerous, as strict regimens like these can cause electrolyte imbalances, vitamin and mineral deficiencies, diarrhea and other stomach problems, and even be lethal.

Karolina Krzyżak, for example — a yoga and vegan enthusiast — starved herself to death after switching completely to a raw food diet, refusing to eat any cooked or processed food. She dreamed of a “clean lifestyle,” but as so many people who turn to radical and alternative dieting, she had no idea what she was talking about scientifically.

At the time of her death, she weighed less than 23 kilograms. Her teeth were ruined, her nails weakened, and her overall health had severely deteriorated. Very clean, indeed.

The liver is our detoxification machine, and detoxifying the normal things we eat, drink and breathe is one of its main tasks, so if you really want to detox you should maintain a (healthy, varied, non-strict) diet which is good for your liver. End of story.

So forget about enemas, radical diets, drinking warm water or other ridiculously naive “detox methods”: everything should be made as simple as possible —

But not simpler.


SOURCES: image retrieved through NEXTA TV. (The last quote is usually wrongly attributed to Albert Einstein.)

The hardest battle was at home

"He was the most decorated soldier in American history. When he came home, the hardest battle was just beginning."

Audie Murphy was born in 1925 in rural Texas, one of twelve children in a sharecropper family so poor he hunted squirrels with a slingshot to put food on the table.

His father abandoned them. His mother died when Audie was a teenager. He dropped out of school in fifth grade to pick cotton and support his younger siblings.

When World War II began, Audie tried to enlist. The Marines rejected him for being too small. The paratroopers turned him away. At 17 years old, weighing barely over 100 pounds and standing 5'5" tall, he finally convinced the Army to take him.

What happened over the next three years became the stuff of legend.

In France, at a place called Holtzwihr, Murphy jumped onto a burning tank destroyer—knowing it could explode at any moment—and used its machine gun to hold off waves of attacking German infantry and tanks. He fought for nearly an hour while standing completely exposed, wounded in the leg, the vehicle burning beneath him.

He was nineteen years old.

When asked after the war why he had seized that machine gun and taken on an entire company of German infantry, his answer was simple:

"They were killing my friends."

By the time the war ended, Murphy had earned every combat medal the U.S. military could award, including the Medal of Honor. He'd also earned five decorations from France and one from Belgium. Thirty-three awards in total. He was featured on the cover of Life magazine as the embodiment of American heroism.

Then he came home.

And discovered that the war wasn't over—not for him.

Murphy suffered from what we now call PTSD, though in 1945 they called it "combat fatigue" or nothing at all. He slept with a loaded gun under his pillow. He had violent flashbacks and crippling nightmares. He became dependent on sleeping pills just to get through the night.

When Murphy realized he was addicted to the medication, he did something that took a different kind of courage: he locked himself in a motel room and suffered through withdrawal symptoms for a week until he broke free.

But the bravest thing he did came after that.

In an era when admitting psychological struggles was seen as weakness—especially for a war hero—Murphy chose to speak openly about his trauma.

He used his fame from Hollywood (where he starred in 44 films, including playing himself in "To Hell and Back") to advocate publicly for veterans' mental health. He called on the U.S. government to study the emotional impact of combat and extend health care benefits to address PTSD and other mental health issues.

He broke the silence when silence was the expected response.

In 1971, five months after Murphy died in a plane crash at age 45, Congress introduced legislation that led to the creation of the Audie L. Murphy Memorial VA Hospital in San Antonio—dedicated to the mental and physical health care of veterans.

Murphy was buried at Arlington National Cemetery with full military honors. His funeral was one of the largest the cemetery had ever held. Hundreds of veterans lined the route.

Today, his gravesite is the second-most-visited in Arlington, after President Kennedy's.

Here's what stays with me about Audie Murphy:

He earned 33 military awards. He saved countless American lives through impossible acts of courage. He became a movie star and used that platform to help veterans who were suffering in silence.

But perhaps his greatest act of bravery wasn't on a battlefield in France.

It was standing up in post-war America and saying: "I'm the most decorated soldier in U.S. history, and I need help. War doesn't end when the shooting stops. It follows you home. It lives in your sleep."

Murphy never pretended to be anything other than what he was: a poor Texas farm boy who did his duty and came home broken by what he'd seen.

He just wanted people to understand that sometimes the hardest battle a soldier fights isn't against the enemy.

It's admitting they need help—and making sure other veterans know it's okay to do the same.Audie Murphy. The boy too small for the Marines who became the most decorated soldier in American history.

Who proved that true courage isn't just about what you do in war.

It's about what you do when you come home.

https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1Fmp28Hqup/

Rooting Out Our Pride

March 6, 2026
Friday of the Second Week of Lent
Readings for Today

The Parable of the Vineyard (one of a set of twelve scenes from The Life of Christ by Jan Rombouts

Video

Jesus said to the chief priests and the elders of the people: “Hear another parable. There was a landowner who planted a vineyard, put a hedge around it, dug a wine press in it, and built a tower. Then he leased it to tenants and went on a journey. When vintage time drew near, he sent his servants to the tenants to obtain his produce. But the tenants seized the servants and one they beat, another they killed, and a third they stoned…” Matthew 21:33–34

Jesus addressed this parable to the chief priests and elders of the people because He loved them. It concludes with Jesus prophesying the fate of these religious leaders: “He will put those wretched men to a wretched death and lease his vineyard to other tenants who will give him the produce at the proper times.” The religious leaders were deeply rooted in their sins, and this parable was meant to uproot those sins, disturbing the soil of their hearts. Out of hope for their conversion, Jesus, in His mercy, took decisive action in a direct, clear, and bold way.

This vineyard image comes from Isaiah 5:1–7, which identifies Israel as the “vineyard of the LORD of hosts.” The landowner is God, and the people of Judah were His “cherished plant.” God had planted, nurtured, and protected His people. The hedge, the wine press, and the tower all point to the care and providence God had for them, showing that they had been given everything they needed to flourish spiritually.

The problem was the “tenants”—the chief priests and elders of the people who had been entrusted with the care of God’s people. They neglected their duty to bear fruit for God’s glory, perverting His Law and usurping His Kingdom for their own prestige, authority, and comfort. Jesus rebuked them harshly, identifying them as murderers, even of the landowner’s son, a clear reference to Himself. Their attachment to power and outward religiosity blinded them to the deeper demands of justice, mercy, and faithfulness to God’s covenant. This pride led to their rejection of the prophets, John the Baptist, and the Messiah.

Though it might be initially unpleasant to do so, take some time to consider how you struggle with similar sins. Do you forcefully and jealously try to control the people in your life? Are you overly concerned about how people perceive you, elevating your public image dishonestly? Are you greedy, desirous of power for selfish gain, and attached to your own comforts? Or is charity at the forefront of your daily mission with people, especially those most difficult to love, avoiding rejection, rash judgment, and condemnation?

Jesus rebuked the religious leaders of His time so strongly because many of them suffered deeply from these sins. He knew that His rebukes would lead some to anger, but He hoped others would repent—and some did. Every rebuke Jesus made was an act of love, and the more deeply entrenched we are in our sins, the more we need this form of direct, confrontational love from our Lord.

Even if the extreme pride of these chief priests and elders is not a major issue for you, pride is likely present in some form. Pride is often the last sin to be purged from our souls, as it is considered the “mother of all sin.” At its core, pride is selfishness, rather than selfless, sacrificial love.

Reflect today on Jesus’ firm rebuke of the religious leaders and His desire to rebuke you. Don’t take offense at this form of love. Be open to it, be humbled by it, experience freedom from it, and rejoice as you see those sins—be they big or small—that keep you from fully surrendering your life to Christ.

Most merciful Lord, though at times You are gentle with Your people, especially when they are broken, fearful, and confused, there are other times when Your love comes in the form of a holy rebuke. Please humble me, Lord, so that I can accept those rebukes and allow Your grace to root out every form of pride with which I struggle. Jesus, I trust in You.

Thursday, March 05, 2026

Is there any truth to the idea that ancient Greeks like Socrates engaged in activities like dancing for fitness, and how common was this practice?

 · 
Following

Let’s answer Socrates himself. Xenophon writes (Symposium 2:16–23):

“Assuredly,” replied Socrates; “and I remarked something else, too,—that no part of his body was idle during the dance, but neck, legs, and hands were all active together. And that is the way a person must dance who intends to increase the suppleness of his body. And for myself,” he continued, addressing the Syracusan, “I should be delighted to learn the figures from you.”

“What use will you make of them?” the other asked.

“I will dance, by Zeus.”

This raised a general laugh; but Socrates, with a perfectly grave expression on his face, said: “You are laughing at me, are you? Is it because I want to exercise to better my health? Or because I want to take more pleasure in my food and my sleep? Or is it because I am eager for such exercises as these, not like the long-distance runners, who develop their legs at the expense of their shoulders, nor like the prize-fighters, who develop their shoulders but become thin-legged, but rather with a view to giving my body a symmetrical development by exercising it in every part?

Or are you laughing because I shall not need to hunt up a partner to exercise with, or to strip, old as I am, in a crowd, but shall find a moderate-sized room1 large enough for me (just as but now this room was large enough for the lad here to get up a sweat in), and because in winter I shall exercise under cover, and when it is very hot, in the shade?

Or is this what provokes your laughter, that I have an unduly large paunch and wish to reduce it? Don't you know that just the other day Charmides here caught me dancing early in the morning?”

“Indeed I did,” said Charmides; “and at first I was dumbfounded and feared that you were going stark mad; but when I heard you say much the same things as you did just now, I myself went home, and although I did not dance, for I had never learned how, I practised shadow-boxing, for I knew how to do that.”

“Undoubtedly,” said Philip; “at any rate, your legs appear so nearly equal in weight to your shoulders that I imagine if you were to go to the market commissioners and put your lower parts in the scale against your upper parts, as if they were loaves of bread,1 they would let you off without a fine.”

“When you are ready to begin your lessons, Socrates,” said Callias, “pray invite me, so that I may be opposite you in the figures and may learn with you.”

To begin with, since the company had applauded the way the boy's natural beauty was increased by the grace of the dancing postures, Philip made a burlesque out of the performance by rendering every part of his body that was in motion more grotesque than it naturally was; and whereas the girl had bent backward until she resembled a hoop, he tried to do the same by bending forward. Finally, since they had given the boy applause for putting every part of his body into play in the dance, he told the flute girl to hit up the time faster, and danced away, flinging out legs, hands, and head all at the same time; and when he was quite exhausted, he exclaimed as he laid himself down: “Here is proof, gentlemen, that my style of dancing, also, gives excellent exercise; it has certainly given me a thirst; so let the servant fill me up the big goblet.”

What we learn from this:

  • At a symposium it was common to have girls and boys dancing for entertainment. The older men liked to see the gracious movements.
  • Socrates, when he was around 70 years old, practiced solo dancing to keep himself in shape.
  • This was not common for old men, so it provoked laughter. Charmides said that he had never learnt to dance, so he did shadow-boxing instead.
  • After Socrates had encouraged him, Callias started to dance and found that it was quite exhausting.

This is similar to the scene of the symposium: a flute player and a dancer

Men and women dancing

What controversial advice have people given their children?

 · 
Follow

“Punch your bully in the face”

When I was in fifth grade, there was a kid who bullied me regularly. He was really big for his age. In the playground, he would yell in my face and get angry for no reason. He would punch me in the stomach, throw me to the ground, or choke me, depending on his mood. I was never violent, so I never retaliated.

I remember how he used to hit me in front of everyone and how ashamed I felt for not punching him back. He even harassed me in front of the girl I like, so it was doubly embarrassing. I never retaliated against his attacks; I was much smaller than him.

In a moment of courage, I explained everything to my mother. I hoped she would talk to my teacher (I would have told the teacher directly, but I was afraid of looking like the kid who snitches). My mother told me, “Stand up for yourself! Be a man, punch that idiot in the face. If you don't, he'll never learn!”

I remained silent and surprised. It wasn't the answer I was expecting.

“Okay,” I thought.

I never intended to follow his advice; I wasn't going to fight with anyone. I wasn't even sure that violence was part of my personality.

The next day during recess, I was playing around with a basketball I found in the trash can. Out of the corner of my eye, I saw my bully harassing another kid. He had grabbed him by the hair and was whispering something threatening in his ear. (Now that I think about it, where were the teachers? Were they blind?)

He turned around, saw that I had the ball, started walking diagonally towards me and yelled, “Hey, stupid!”

I felt terrified. I had rehearsed how to respond the night before, but I was still very scared. And to top it all off, the girl I liked was right next to me, completely unaware of my tormentor's imminent arrival.

He came up to me and put his face two inches from mine and repeated, "Hey, stupid, didn't you hear me? I was talking to you."

I stared at him, not knowing what to do.

With his breath on my face, he repeated again, "Hey, stupid, I told you, did you hear me!"

He grabbed my hair just like he had with the other boy, but I resisted. I vaguely remember the rest. We started wrestling with our arms intertwined and fell to the ground at the same time. He was much bigger and stronger than me, but I was determined not to let him strangle me or hit me anymore. We rolled around on the ground a few times; I remember the taste of dirt in my mouth and heard Annie, the girl I liked, shout something like, “Stop it, leave him alone!”

Somehow I managed to break free from his grasp and without thinking, I raised my fist and punched him in the face as hard as I could.

He stared at me, dismayed and silent. He let out a little girl's shriek and ran off crying. I remember turning around and seeing Annie with her hands over her mouth, but smiling.

I felt like the coolest kid in the world.

That's when, miraculously, the teachers appeared and punished me. But it was worth it. He never bothered me again.

I'm not encouraging any child to hit others; this situation was solely my personal experience. And it worked. 

A genius unrecognized in his lifetime, immortal ever since

He died alone in a tiny apartment, convinced his greatest work was a failure—he never knew it would become the most assigned book in American schools and sell 30 million copies.

December 21, 1940. Hollywood, California.

F. Scott Fitzgerald, age 44, suffered a massive heart attack while eating a chocolate bar and reading the Princeton Alumni Weekly. He collapsed in the apartment of his companion, columnist Sheilah Graham. The man who had once defined an entire era—the Jazz Age—died believing he had wasted his talent.

When his obituary appeared in the New York Times, it was respectful but damning: Fitzgerald was described as a writer who had "fallen into obscurity."

They weren't wrong. At the time of his death, virtually all his books were out of print.

Fifteen years earlier, everything had seemed possible.

In 1925, F. Scott Fitzgerald published The Great Gatsby, a slim novel about wealth, obsession, and the corruption of the American Dream. He was 28 years old, already famous from his debut This Side of Paradise, married to the beautiful and wild Zelda Sayre, living the glamorous life he wrote about.

He expected Gatsby to be his masterpiece—the book that would cement his literary legacy and solve his chronic money problems.

Instead, it barely sold.

The first printing was 20,000 copies. Reviews were mixed—some critics called it brilliant, others found it disappointing. But more importantly, readers didn't care. By the time Fitzgerald died fifteen years later, the novel had sold roughly 20,000 to 25,000 copies total. For comparison, his earlier novel This Side of Paradise had sold 50,000 copies in its first year alone.

The Great Gatsby was, by every measurable standard, a commercial failure.

And Fitzgerald knew it. He knew every painful copy sold, every rejection, every reminder that the book he'd poured his soul into had barely made a ripple.

Then the 1929 stock market crash shattered the world he'd chronicled. The Jazz Age—that glittering, reckless era of speakeasies and flappers—was over. Suddenly, novels about wealthy people's romantic problems felt tone-deaf. The culture had moved on, and Fitzgerald's star began its long, humiliating descent.

His wife Zelda, the brilliant, magnetic muse who had inspired so much of his work, suffered a complete mental breakdown in 1930. She was diagnosed with schizophrenia and spent the rest of her life moving between expensive psychiatric institutions. The medical bills were crushing—thousands of dollars annually that Fitzgerald, now out of fashion, struggled to pay.

His own drinking spiraled. Deadlines were missed. Publishers grew frustrated. His short stories—once commanding $4,000 each from the Saturday Evening Post—were now being rejected or bought for a fraction of the price.

By 1937, desperate and broke, Fitzgerald moved to Hollywood to work as a contract screenwriter for MGM at $1,000 a week. It wasn't the literary career he'd dreamed of. It was survival.

He rewrote scripts that rarely credited his work. Studios saw him as unreliable—brilliant when sober, impossible when drinking. He worked on Three Comrades (1938), one of the few films to actually credit him, but he was routinely removed from projects before completion.

Colleagues described a man clinging to dignity: disciplined and focused during the day, drinking heavily at night, trying to maintain the image of a serious writer even as Hollywood treated him as just another hired hand.

In his final years, he wrote to his daughter Scottie: "I wish now I'd never relaxed or looked back—but said at the end of The Great Gatsby: 'I've found my line—from now on this comes first.'"

He believed he'd squandered his talent. He believed Gatsby had failed. He believed his career was over.

On that December afternoon in 1940, when his heart stopped beating, F. Scott Fitzgerald died thinking he was a failure.

He had no idea what was about to happen.During World War II, the U.S. military needed books to keep soldiers' morale up. Through the Armed Services Editions program, they distributed small, portable paperbacks to troops overseas—cheap editions designed to fit in a soldier's pocket.

Someone decided to include The Great Gatsby.

More than 150,000 copies were distributed to American servicemen. Young men sitting in foxholes and barracks and transport ships read Fitzgerald's slim novel about parties and wealth and disillusionment. And something clicked.

When those soldiers came home, many became students under the G.I. Bill. They went to college. And when professors asked what books had moved them during the war, they mentioned The Great Gatsby.

By the late 1940s and early 1950s, the novel began appearing in college literature courses. Scholars started analyzing it. English teachers started assigning it. A new generation discovered the book their parents' generation had ignored.

By the 1960s, The Great Gatsby was canon—required reading in high schools and universities across America.

Today, it has sold more than 30 million copies worldwide. It's taught in nearly every American high school. More than 500,000 copies are sold annually, just in the United States. It's been adapted into films five times. Lines like "So we beat on, boats against the current" are quoted by people who've never read the full book.

The novel that sold 25,000 copies in Fitzgerald's lifetime now sells more than that every single month.

F. Scott Fitzgerald spent his final years convinced his masterpiece was a failure.

He died believing his best work had been forgotten.

He never lived to see his name become synonymous with American literature.

Here's what makes this story unbearable and beautiful at the same time:

Fitzgerald didn't fail. The world failed to recognize him while he was alive.

The value was always there—in every perfectly chosen word, in every aching sentence about longing and loss, in every metaphor that captured the American Dream's hollow core. The genius was present in 1925, when barely anyone noticed, and in 1940, when Fitzgerald died thinking it didn't matter.

The only thing that changed was the world's ability to see it.

This is the terror and the hope of creating anything meaningful: you may never know if it mattered. You might spend your entire life believing you failed, when in reality, your work was just waiting for the world to catch up.

F. Scott Fitzgerald died broke, forgotten, and heartbroken.

But he was wrong about almost everything.

He wasn't a failure. He wasn't forgotten. His greatest work didn't disappear.

He just didn't live long enough to see the truth: that he'd written something that would outlast skyscrapers and stock markets and jazz bands. Something that would speak to teenagers in 2025 as powerfully as it was meant to speak to readers in 1925.

The green light at the end of Daisy's dock—that symbol of yearning for something just out of reach—turned out to be Fitzgerald reaching for immortality.

And he caught it.

https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1aLaUd981P/