Friday, February 06, 2026

Native American culture

Photographer Nancy Greifenhagen has a passion for capturing the essence of Native American culture. She primarily stages, directs, and photographs traditional scenes in South Dakota, focusing on historical reenactments, cultural education, and catching intimate moments.

Native Lakota Sioux boy crouching in the dead grasses, hunting with a bow and arrow:

Pictured below is David William Beautiful Bald Eagle Sr. ("Waniyetu Opi") — he was an Oglala Lakota Sioux performer, actor, and advocate.

  • He was born in 1919 on the Cheyenne River Sioux Reservation in South Dakota.
  • Bald Eagle was a highly respected elder, veteran, and former chief.
  • Bald Eagle was a veteran of World War II and the Korean War, as well as a stunt double for actors like Errol Flynn.
  • He was the grandson of Chief White Bull, who led a charge at the Battle of the Little Bighorn.
  • Bald Eagle passed away peacefully at the age of 97 in the summer of 2016.

Lakota Sioux natives riding across the meadows of South Dakota:

Per the Nancy G. Photography website, her work “often features Lakota Sioux individuals in traditional habitats and attire, such as tipis, feathers, and beaded clothing.”

Nancy builds a rapport with local tribe members where she does her photo shoots - and Native Americans who participate as models ensure their heritage is represented accurately in a historical context.

Traditional Lakota Sioux cradleboard for infants:

Horses and Indian ponies play a major part of Nancy’s photo work as well:

Apache Native American youth that Nancy photographed on a paint horse in Texas:

[All photos courtesy of Nancy Greifenhagen]

How do tourists/visitors feel about my country Belgium in general, and its capital Brussels in specific?


Profile photo for Assistant
Assistant

Belgium overall

  • General impressions
    • Friendly, polite and service-oriented population; multilingualism (Dutch/French/German/English) is widely noticed and appreciated.
    • Compact, well-connected country that feels easy to explore by train or car.
    • Clean, safe and orderly urban environments with efficient public services.
    • Strong reputation for food and drink: chocolate, waffles, fries, beer and regional specialties (moules-frites, stoofvlees) frequently cited as highlights.
    • High architectural variety: medieval towns (Bruges, Ghent), Art Nouveau, postwar modernism, and industrial heritage produce a sense of historical depth and visual richness.
    • Perceived as slightly expensive compared with some neighbors, especially in tourist hotspots and for nightlife or dining in major cities.
    • Reputation for bureaucracy and linguistic complexity; some visitors find regional identities and language politics curious but not usually obstructive to travel.
  • Typical compliments
    • Charming small towns and well-preserved historic centres.
    • Excellent museums and art heritage (Rubens in Antwerp, Flemish primitives) and strong contemporary art scenes.
    • Exceptional beer culture and specialized breweries; beer tourism is a major draw.
    • Efficient public transport between cities and across borders (high-speed trains to Paris/Amsterdam).
  • Typical criticisms or annoyances
    • Weather: overcast, rain-prone climate that can disappoint expectations of sunshine.
    • Perceived dullness of some modern urban areas or business districts compared with picturesque towns.
    • Mixed impressions of service quality in certain hospitality sectors (varies by venue).
    • Language signage and the French–Flemish divide occasionally cause confusion for visitors expecting a single national identity.

Brussels (capital-specific)

  • Core impressions
    • International, cosmopolitan atmosphere driven by EU institutions, NATO and numerous international corporations and NGOs.
    • Multicultural culinary scene and excellent cafés, bistros and specialized restaurants.
    • A patchwork city: juxtaposition of grand ceremonial boulevards and impressive public buildings (Parc de Bruxelles, Mont des Arts, Palais de Justice) with gritty neighbourhoods and lively local markets.
    • Rich museum offer (Musées royaux des Beaux-Arts, Magritte Museum, WIELS contemporary art) and notable comic-strip heritage (Belgian Comic Strip Center, Tintin murals).
    • Iconic, if polarising, attractions: Grand-Place consistently praised as one of Europe’s most beautiful squares; Manneken Pis charming more for its story than scale.
  • Positive highlights frequently mentioned by visitors
    • Grand-Place and surrounding guildhouses: unanimous “must-see.”
    • Beer bars, specialty shops and chocolate ateliers — perception of high-quality, artisanal products.
    • Walkable central districts with surprising architectural gems (Art Nouveau houses by Victor Horta).
    • Easy day-trip gateway to other Belgian cities and nearby international destinations.
  • Criticisms and recurring negatives
    • Patchiness: excellent central areas contrasted with parts of the city perceived as run-down or poorly maintained.
    • Safety concerns at night in certain neighborhoods; pickpocketing and street harassment reported occasionally (similar to many large European capitals).
    • Perception of unpleasant smells or litter in busy streets and around transport hubs.
    • Confusing signage and a somewhat disjointed tourist infrastructure compared with smaller, more curated tourist cities like Bruges.
    • Some visitors find Brussels lacking a single, easily communicated identity — simultaneously international and bureaucratic, historic and modern — which can feel fragmented.

Practical takeaways for hosts, tourism planners and businesses

  • Emphasize strengths: craft beer routes, chocolate workshops, guided art and architecture walks, combined itineraries linking Brussels with nearby historic towns.
  • Improve signage and information points in multilingual formats; better wayfinding from transport hubs to major sites.
  • Targeted cleanliness, lighting and safety upgrades around key tourist corridors and night-time hotspots to reduce negative perceptions.
  • Promote curated, themed experiences (e.g., Art Nouveau tours, comic-strip trails, brewery circuits) to give visitors coherent narratives of the city.
  • Train front-line staff in multilingual customer service and local story-telling to convert curiosity about language politics into a positive cultural talking point.

Representative visitor stories (examples)

  • A couple: enchanted by Bruges and Brussels’ Grand-Place, loved beer tastings, found some neighborhoods unexpectedly gritty but still felt safe overall.
  • A solo EU-policy professional: appreciated Brussels’ cosmopolitan vibe and transport links, frustrated by occasional litter and chaotic crowds near major institutions.
  • A family: enjoyed museums and chocolate workshops, noted unpredictable weather and occasional long queues; found the city walkable and family-friendly.

Context note

  • Observations reflect visitor sentiment up to May 2024; perceptions remain shaped by seasonality (summer festival crowds vs. quieter winter months) and by ongoing local improvements in urban management and tourism services.

A Chinese Doctor Replaced My 75-Year-Old Grandmother’s Pills With This Powerful Drink

A Chinese Doctor Replaced My 75-Year-Old Grandmother’s Pills With This Powerful Drink – And Said Goodbye to Joint Pain, Fatty Liver, Diabetes, Stomach Aches & More

At the age of 75, my grandmother had a medicine cabinet full of pills — for her joints, her liver, her blood sugar, and her digestion. But everything changed when a Chinese doctor introduced her to this ancient healing drink. After just a few weeks, she no longer needed most of her medications. 

This simple, natural remedy helped her say goodbye to joint pain, fatty liver, diabetes, stomach discomfort, and much more — and now, we’re sharing it with you.

🌿 The Ingredients Behind This Healing Tea This powerful recipe is made with 5 natural ingredients that have been trusted in Chinese and Ayurvedic medicine for centuries:3 cinnamon sticks – Helps regulate blood sugar, reduce inflammation, and improve circulation.6 bay leaves – Aids digestion, reduces stomach cramps, and supports liver detox.1 small piece of ginger (peeled and chopped) – Known for its anti-inflammatory and antioxidant powers.10 cloves – Fights infections, relieves joint pain, and enhances metabolism.500 ml (half a liter) of water

🫖 How to Prepare This Powerful Drink Step-by-step instructions:In a medium-sized pot, add 3 sticks of cinnamon, 6 bay leaves, chopped ginger, and 10 cloves.

Pour in half a liter of water. Bring it to a boil and let it simmer for about 15 minutes. After boiling, strain the liquid into a cup using a fine sieve. Let it cool slightly and enjoy it warm. Optional: You can add a teaspoon of honey or lemon juice for extra flavor and benefits.

☕ How to Take It for Best Results Drink one cup every morning, about 30 minutes before breakfast, for three consecutive weeks. People who’ve tried this method report: Reduced joint and muscle painImproved liver function Lower blood sugar levels Less bloating and stomach discomfort Higher energy levels and better sleep

❤️ A Gentle Yet Powerful Natural Ally Unlike synthetic medications that often come with side effects, this natural tea works in harmony with the body. It gently detoxifies, balances blood sugar, and nourishes vital organs — especially helpful for seniors and anyone with chronic inflammation.

Even if you’re in your 30s, 50s, or 70s, this recipe can offer a gentle reset to your system.

📢 Tell Us What You Think! If you try this recipe, we’d love to hear from you. On a scale from 1 to 10, how would you rate it? Let us know in the comments — and don’t forget to share this remedy with someone who could benefit from it too.🧡 Natural healing is not about doing more — it’s about doing less, with the right ingredients.

A Guilty Conscience

February 6, 2026
Memorial of Saint Paul Miki and Companions, Martyrs
Readings for Today
Readings for Friday of the Fourth Week in Ordinary Time

The beheading of St. John the Baptist by Caravaggio

Video

King Herod heard about Jesus, for his fame had become widespread, and people were saying, “John the Baptist has been raised from the dead; That is why mighty powers are at work in him.” Others were saying, “He is Elijah”; still others, “He is a prophet like any of the prophets.” But when Herod learned of it, he said, “It is John whom I beheaded. He has been raised up.” Mark 6:14–16

When a person sins seriously and refuses to repent, the damaging effects of that sin deepen over time, creating spiritual blindness and unrest. In contrast, repentance not only brings forgiveness, it allows God to transform the wounds of sin into instruments of grace, using even our failures for His glory.

Herod is a prime example of how obstinacy magnifies the damage caused by sin. The first paragraph of today’s Gospel takes place some time after Herod executed John. The rest of the Gospel recounts how Herod was manipulated into beheading John by Herodias, his illegitimate wife, and her daughter. While much could be said about John’s execution and the good fruit borne by his ultimate testimony to the Truth, it is also helpful to reflect on Herod’s pitiful state to learn from his failure in order to avoid a similar response to sin.

As soon as Jesus was baptized by John in the Jordan River, John’s ministry began to decrease, as he himself acknowledged: “He must increase; I must decrease” (John 3:30). John’s mission was one of preparation for the Messiah, calling people to repentance and pointing to the One who would bring salvation. Once Jesus began His public ministry, John’s work was complete, and God permitted his arrest by Herod so that his martyrdom could become his greatest witness to Christ.

Jesus’ ministry was markedly different from John’s. While John preached repentance and fearlessly rebuked Herod for his sinful relationship, Jesus’ public ministry was marked not only by authoritative teaching but also by miraculous signs, including healings and even raising the dead. His fame spread quickly, reaching even Herod.

When Herod heard about Jesus, he irrationally concluded that Jesus was John the Baptist raised from the dead. This reaction reveals Herod’s inner turmoil. His erroneous belief was not borne of faith but of the torment of a guilty conscience. Herod had killed a holy man. His unresolved guilt blinded him to this truth and distorted his perception of Jesus, preventing him from recognizing the Messiah.

Herod’s tragic story reveals the universal danger of unrepentant sin, offering us a lesson about the destructive power of guilt and the healing grace of repentance. Unrepentant sin not only leads to further sin but also causes irrational thinking, fear, and paranoia. His guilt interfered with his ability to think clearly and rationally—not only about Jesus but likely about many other aspects of his life.

Similarly, when we fall into serious sin, we are faced with two paths: repentance or obstinacy. Repentance opens the door to God’s mercy, healing, and transformation. Through His grace, this path not only sets us free but also forms virtue within us and opens us to the spiritual gift of wisdom. Obstinacy, on the other hand, leaves us in spiritual unrest, deepening the wounds of sin. That path leads to self-destructive irrationality, confusion, and blindness.

Reflect today on the importance of sincere and total repentance for past sins. Though difficult, an honest assessment of our sins and sincere repentance is the path to immediate freedom and eternal glory. We must understand and believe in the power of repentance. When we fall into sin, we must have the courage to face it, own it, and seek God’s mercy. Learn from Herod by rejecting his example, and allow God’s mercy to flood your life, eliminating the effects of a guilty conscience and leading you to peace and freedom.

Most merciful Lord, I come before You as a sinner in need of Your infinite mercy. Free me from the spiritual blindness and obstinacy that prevent me from fully opening my heart to You. Grant me the courage to confess my guilt without fear, so that I may receive the forgiveness only You can give. By Your grace, transform my past sins into opportunities for Your glory, and turn my guilt into virtue through the gifts of Your Holy Spirit. Jesus, I trust in You.

Thursday, February 05, 2026

George Gershwin didn't need a degree to be great

 · 
Follow

He begged the world's greatest teachers to train him. They refused. Then he created a masterpiece that proved they were right to say no.

Paris, spring of 1928.

George Gershwin sat in a café, twenty-nine years old and already famous beyond measure. Four years earlier, he had composed Rhapsody in Blue—a piece that exploded across America like nothing before it. Broadway producers fought for his music. Concert halls sold out when his name appeared. Wealth and acclaim surrounded him.

Yet inside, he felt hollow.

Because despite writing some of the most celebrated American music ever created, Gershwin had never received the training that "serious" composers possessed. No conservatory degree. No European education. Just piano lessons as a teenager and some composition study with teachers in New York.

He was a song plugger from Tin Pan Alley who wrote catchy tunes that happened to sound sophisticated. That's what he feared critics whispered. Worse—that's what he sometimes believed about himself.

So Gershwin came to Paris with a desperate plan: study with the masters. Gain the classical credentials he lacked. Transform himself into a legitimate composer.

He sought out Nadia Boulanger—the most influential composition teacher alive. She had trained Aaron Copland and Virgil Thomson. Future legends like Philip Glass and Quincy Jones would study under her. If anyone could grant Gershwin the validation he craved, it was Boulanger.

He asked if she would accept him as a student.

She refused.

Not because he lacked talent. Not because of his age or his success or his American background.

She refused because she believed formal classical training would destroy what made him extraordinary.

Boulanger saw his jazz-infused melodies, his ability to blur the line between art and entertainment, his gift for writing music that moved both scholars and everyday listeners. That fusion was his genius. Rigorous classical training might teach him the rules—and in learning them, he might lose the courage to break them.

She wouldn't teach him because teaching him might ruin him.

Gershwin was devastated. He had crossed the ocean seeking the approval of European classical music's gatekeepers. Instead, he'd been told his lack of formal training was actually his strength.

Perhaps she was wrong. Perhaps he needed to find someone else.

He approached Maurice Ravel—composer of Boléro, master of orchestration, one of the greatest living musicians in the world.

Gershwin made his request. Ravel listened thoughtfully, then asked an unexpected question:

"How much do you earn in a year?"

Confused, Gershwin answered honestly: around $250,000—an astronomical sum in 1928, equivalent to roughly $4 million today.

Ravel smiled.

"Then I should be studying with you."

Then came the words that would echo through music history: "Why become a second-rate Ravel when you're already a first-rate Gershwin?"

Two rejections. Two masters refusing him. Both delivering the same message: What you have cannot be taught. Don't let anyone, including us, change it.

Gershwin returned to his Parisian apartment, probably confused, probably still doubting himself, probably wondering if they were simply being kind.

Then he started writing.

He composed An American in Paris—a symphonic poem that opens with the rhythm of footsteps, an American wandering through French streets. He incorporated actual Parisian taxi horns into the score. Blues melodies expressed homesickness. Jazz rhythms danced through classical orchestration. Popular music sensibility merged with sophisticated composition.

It was everything he was. Everything those teachers told him not to suppress with formal training.

The piece premiered in New York on December 13, 1928, conducted by Walter Damrosch. Audiences erupted. Critics celebrated it. It became one of the most performed American orchestral works of the twentieth century.

Gershwin had been rejected by Europe's classical establishment.

In response, he composed a masterpiece that validated their rejection.

Because what made George Gershwin irreplaceable couldn't be learned in any conservatory.

He had grown up as Jacob Gershwine, born September 26, 1898, to Russian Jewish immigrants in New York City. At fifteen, he became a song plugger in Tin Pan Alley, playing piano in music stores to demonstrate new songs. He absorbed everything—jazz, ragtime, blues, classical pieces, popular songs. He learned harmony by feeling how chords moved, not by memorizing textbook rules.

At twenty-five, he composed Rhapsody in Blue in barely five weeks. It premiered February 12, 1924, and instantly became iconic. Was it jazz? Classical? Popular music? All of those. None of those. Something entirely new.

That's why teaching Gershwin was dangerous. His genius lay in ignoring the walls between "serious" and "popular," between jazz and classical, between art and entertainment.

Formal training would have taught him to respect those boundaries. Would have made him self-conscious about crossing them.

Boulanger and Ravel understood: his lack of credentials wasn't a weakness. It was his superpower.

After An American in Paris, Gershwin composed Porgy and Bess with his brother Ira and author DuBose Heyward—an opera blending jazz, blues, spirituals, and classical traditions. Critics initially dismissed it as neither opera nor musical theater.

Today it's recognized as one of America's most important operas. "Summertime" became one of the most recorded songs in history.

In 1936, Gershwin moved to Hollywood, composing film scores at the height of his creative powers.

Then in early 1937, headaches began. Behavioral changes. Memory problems. Coordination difficulties.

Doctors found nothing. Some suggested psychological causes.

On July 9, 1937, he collapsed. They discovered a brain tumor—glioblastoma, advanced and inoperable.

George Gershwin died July 11, 1937. He was thirty-eight years old.

In just fourteen years—from Rhapsody in Blue to his death—he created an enduring American musical legacy. Countless Broadway shows, film scores, concert works, standards still performed worldwide.

He did all of this without the formal training he thought he needed.

Because Boulanger and Ravel were right: classical training would have taught him the rules. And Gershwin's genius was breaking them without knowing they existed.

When Gershwin approached those masters in Paris, insecure about his credentials, seeking validation from European musical tradition, he was asking the wrong question.

He asked: "Can you teach me to be legitimate?"

They answered: "You already are. Don't let anyone—including us—change that."

The rejection was the greatest gift he ever received.

It forced him to stop seeking external approval and trust his own voice.

The result was An American in Paris. Porgy and Bess. Everything else he created in his final nine years.

George Gershwin died tragically young. We'll never know what he might have composed with another thirty or forty years.

But we know what he composed in thirty-eight years.

And it's more than enough.

He didn't become a second-rate anyone.

He was a first-rate Gershwin.

And the world is richer for it.

https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1DJLFM9MRe/