I believe that, on humanitarian grounds, countries should share the burden of hosting refugees. Countries have the right to say who can stay permanently or temporarily or not at all. They should allow those with useful skills to stay if their skills are needed. If they're not refugees but are, instead, taking advantage of the situation to live in Europe, then they should not be allowed in at all.
Refugees seeking citizenship should know, up front, that they will be returned home once their country stabilizes if their citizenship request is denied (and if no existing employer has agreed to host them for citizenship). A statute of limitations, say 5 or 7 years, should apply to their temporary status. After that, they can reapply for citizenship.
I know most will not want to go back but, if they were taken in on a temporary, humanitarian, basis they will at least be expecting to be returned home eventually. If their citizenship request was denied but they've since found work, their employer can sponsor them for citizenship. After the 5 to 7 year statute of limitations on temporary status lapses and they apply, again, for citizenship, they will not be a good candidate for citizenship if they haven't been able to settle down and fit in. These people would be obvious choices for repatriation.
There are several reasons for this. First and foremost, to make sure it's only real refugees that you're helping. It would also be necessary for immigration control: making sure the host country can successfully integrate refugees as citizens. If they want citizenship, they should demonstrate that desire: passable fluency in the host country's language should be a requirement for citizenship. Part of the immigration process should be an educational program to stress the importance and value of integration into their host society and of responsible citizenship.
No comments:
Post a Comment